Krishan Chand And Others v. Poonamdip Kaur, Md, Prtc

COCP No.1100 of 2019 -1-


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP No.1100 of 2019 Date of Decision: 17.07.2019 Krishan Chand and others Petitioners

Versus

Poonamdip Kaur, Managing Director, Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Nabha Road, Patiala Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Gurjeet Brar, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ankit Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondent.

**** AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

The present contempt petition has been filed pleading wilful disobedience of order dated 12.10.2018 passed by this Court in CWP No.9200 of 2018.

The operational part of the order is reproduced below:-
    

    

                

     

         



             







   



 



  



   

 



The respondent has filed the reply by way of affidavit of Arvind Gupta, Legal Advisor, Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.07.20 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh

COCP No.1100 of 2019 -2Patiala, same is taken on record. Copy of reply is handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner. It has been stated that interest on Gratuity, Leave Encashment and General Provident Fund has been calculated. Interest calculated on General Provident Fund has been given to the petitioners through cheques and interest on Gratuity and Leave Encashment has been transferred to Depot concerned for depositing the same in the savings bank accounts of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent states that interest shall be transferred to the petitioners within two weeks from today. In view of reply filed and statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for the petitioners states that no cause of action survives for pursuing the contempt petition. The contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous. The petitioners would be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if some grievance still survives. The rule issued against the respondent is discharged. [AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE July 17, 2019  

 

  

      
  



    PANKAJ BAWEJA 2019.07.20 13:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Ciourt, Chandigarh