Sunil v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24128 of 2017 Date of Decision: 24.10.2017 Sunil ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - None for the petitioner.
Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been made for grant of pre-arrest bail to petitioner - Sunil in case FIR No.130 dated 11.04.2016 under Sections 380 and 457 IPC registered at Police Station Matlauda, District Panipat.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 31.08.2017. Today again adjournment slip has been filed by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Rajpal, submits that the petitioner has not joined the investigation despite directions and grant of interim bail by this Court to him.
Considering above fact, written request for adjournment is declined and the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (RAMENDRA JAIN) October 24, 2017 JUDGE R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2017.10.24 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Whether Reportable Yes/No