Bharat Bhushan v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-12486 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION: 18.08.2020 Bharat Bhushan

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present :

Mr. Parveen Kumar Rohilla, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Bhupender Singh, DAG, Haryana.

(Presence marked through video conference) ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No.039 dated 06.02.2020, under Section 174-A of IPC registered at Police Station Civil Line, Jind.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 25.06.2020, the petitioner has joined the investigation and has fully cooperated in the same.

3.

Learned State counsel does not controvert joining of investigation by the petitioner. He submits that per his instructions custodial interrogation of the petitioner is no more required.

4.

In view of the above, since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is no more required and he has already joined the investigation and cooperated with the investigating officer, the petition is allowed. Order dated 25.06.2020 granting interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the petitioner's complying with provisions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(ARUN MONGA) August 18th 2020 JUDGE vandana Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SONU 2020.08.19 08:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document