Sanjeev Kumar And ORS v. Neelam

Crl. Misc. No. M-24207 of 2017 -1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-24207 of 2017 Date of Decision: 23.4.2018 Sanjeev Kumar and others ......Petitioner

Versus

Neelam .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. P.K.Kataria, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Meenu Verma, Advocate for the respondent.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of complaint No. 176 dated 27.11.2015 (Annexure P-1) and summoning order dated 6.3.2017 (Anneuxre P-2). The litigation expenses of Rs. 20,000/- which had been ordered on the previous date have been paid today in the Court. Limited notice was issued in this case. The matter was thereafter sent for mediation. Report of Mediation and Conciliation Centre has been received that mediation was not possible. Counsel for the petitioners contends that they are entitled to a hearing on merits.

Counsel for the respondent points out that limited notice had been issued.

The coordinate Bench had issued notice only to a limited Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.04.25 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-24207 of 2017 -2extent. Mediation has failed. The petition is dismissed. (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE April 23, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.04.25 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh