High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/24275/2017allowed

Navdeep Singh @ Navi v. State Of Punjab & Others

2017-11-09Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-24275-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-24275 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: November 09, 2017 Navdeep Singh @ Navi ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, Advocate for the complainant.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.79 dated 21.06.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 326, 336 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act, at Police Station Division No.6, Jalandhar. Heard.

Learned State counsel on instructions from Investigating Officer submits that the matter has since been amicably settled by the parties and copy of compromise has been made available to the Investigating Officer. Petitioner has joined the investigation, which is still Sachin Mehta 2017.11.09 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-24275-2017 -2in progress but his further custodial interrogation is no more required. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and the order dated 28.07.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) November 09, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.11.09 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh