Paramjit Singh @ Pamma v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25235-2018 Date of Decision: July 09, 2018 Paramjit Singh @ Pamma .....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDIP AHLUWALIA

Present:

Mr.Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Manjri Nehru Kaul, Addl.A.G., Punjab.

........

SURYA KANT, J.(ORAL) Counsel for the parties jointly inform that the prosecution has completed its evidence and the case is now listed for defence evidence. [2] However, it is clarified that the petitioner may examine as many witnesses in his defence as are deemed appropriate and/or permitted by the Court. Similarly, his co-accused may also examine their witnesses separately. The learned Special Judge shall make an endeavour that the defence evidence is concluded on behalf of all the accused within two months.

[3] Keeping these directions in view, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition, at this stage. [4] Disposed of accordingly.

( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE July 09, 2018 ( SUDIP AHLUWALIA ) meenuss JUDGE 1.

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No 2.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No Meenu 2018.07.12 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh