Jashanjot v. State Of Punjab
CRM-M-24298-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24298-2017 Date of decision: 28.07.2017 Jashanjot ..... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN PRESENT: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. BS Baath, DAG, Punjab.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) 1.
Through this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 42 dated 19.05.2017 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Amloh, Fatehgarh Sahib.
2.
The allegation against the petitioner is that he, in conspiracy with his real sister-Kiranjit Joshi, committed the murder of his brother-inlaw (husband of his sister), namely; Hari Pal on 18.05.2017 at village Salana Jiwan Singh Wala.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has no role to play in the murder of his brother-in-law, namely, Hari Pal. There was constant matrimonial dispute between her sister and deceasedHari Pal. The petitioner resides 50 kms. away from the place where the murder of Hari Pal was committed. At the time of murder, the petitioner was not present at village Salana Jiwan Singh Wala. 4.
On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed Rishu Kataria 2017.07.31 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-24298-2017 -2the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner by submitting that the police has found the involvement of the petitioner in the murder of Hari Pal after collecting sufficient evidence including his call details. According to the call details, the petitioner and his sister-Kiranjit Joshi were in constant touch with each other prior to the murder of Hari Pal and immediately, thereafter.
5.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the investigating agency had found the involvement of the petitioner in the murder of his brother-in-law Hari Pal aforesaid, the instant petition being without merits, is dismissed.
July 28, 2017 ( RAMENDRA JAIN ) rishu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Rishu Kataria 2017.07.31 17:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document