Dimple v. State Of Haryana & ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25240-2016 Date of Decision:- 27.07.2016 Dimple ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others ....Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:
Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Today the petitioner is present in person in Court along with his neighbourer Dhiraj.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent Nos.1 to 3 for protection of her life and liberty from the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6.
The marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with a person of 40 years of age whereas her age is 18 years only. She left her matrimonial house after two days of her marriage. She has made a representation dated 21.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken thereon till date.
In view of above, without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Sonipat (respondent No.2), to look into the representation dated 21.07.2016 (Annexure P-2), filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law. July 27, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE NARESH KUMAR 2016.07.29 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh