← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/14102/2025allowed

Pargat Singh And Others v. State Of Punjab And Other

2025-05-01Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal2 pages

CRM-M-14102-2025(O&M) -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14102 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 Pargat Singh and Others .....PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Punjab and Others ....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL

Present:

Mr. Rajiv K. Kapila, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab.

**** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-14702-2025 Allowed as prayed for and original affidavits of the complainant-party namely, Lakhwinder Singh and Parminder Singh are taken on record. Main case 1.

By way of this petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.121 dated 26.06.2023 for offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 506 IPC, 1860 (section 326 IPC, 1860 added later on) registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2). 2.

Notice of motion.

3.

Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of Sonia Puri 2025.05.02 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-14102-2025(O&M) -2the respondent-State. 4.

Mr. Manjit Singh Ghuman, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3 has filed his Power of Attorney and confirms the factum of the compromise having been effected between the parties and states that respondent Nos.2 and 3 have no objection to the quashing of FIR in question.

5.

Learned State counsel has stated no objection in case the FIR is quashed based upon the compromise.

6.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record.

8.

In view of the above, even if this case is taken to its logical conclusion, it would only be an exercise in futility as the parties have already settled their differences, therefore, no purpose would be served in wasting the time and resources of the State in pursuing this case to its pre-ordained end. It would, therefore, be better to give a quietus to the issue at this stage. 9.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.121 dated 26.06.2023 for offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 148, 149, 506 IPC, 1860 (section 326 IPC, 1860 added later on) registered at Police Station Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby, quashed qua the petitioners.

10.

Needless to say that the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise.

(H.S. GREWAL) 01.05.2025 JUDGE Sonia Puri Whether speaking/ reasoned :

Yes/No Whether Reportable :

Yes/No Sonia Puri 2025.05.02 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document