Sumit Kumar Gupta v. State Of Punjab And ANR.

CRM-M-25279-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25279-2016 Date of Decision:- 28.09.2016 Sumit Kumar Gupta ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. S.P.S. Sidhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.D. Sachdeva, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

Mr. O.P. Kamboj, Advocate for respondent No.2.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 27.07.2016 of this Court, the petitioner was directed to appear/surrender before the learned trial Court and the trial Court was required to admit him to interim bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court on 04.08.2016 and bail bonds furnished by him, in pursuance of order of this Court, were accepted by the trial Court. Learned State counsel, on instructions from investigating officer, has informed that he does not dispute the said fact. Naresh Kumar 2016.10.03 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-25279-2016 -2Considering the fact that the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court, the order dated 27.07.2016 passed by this is hereby made absolute and the present petition stands disposed of accordingly. However, the petitioner shall be bound by the conditions imposed by the trial Court.

September 28, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.10.03 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh