High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25285/2016allowed

Rahul v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-01Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg2 pages

CRM-M-25285-2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-25285-2016 Date of Decision:- 01.09.2016 Rahul ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) Present petition is for release of petitioner on regular bail in FIR No.91 dated 14.03.2016, under Sections 395, 354, 354-B, 323, 506, 412 read with Section 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Faridabad.

Learned State counsel has placed on record the custody certificate dated 31.08.2016 to show that the petitioner has already undergone 5 months and 12 days during the period of trial. She further informed that after framing of charges, there was total 31 witnesses and till date no witness has been examined.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and with their able assistance gone through the material available on record. Naresh Kumar 2016.09.03 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-25285-2016 -2The petitioner was arrested on 20.03.2016. Since then, he is in judicial custody and no useful purpose would be served to further detain him in jail. The final conclusion of trial will take a long time. In view of above facts, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail on his furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge/Duty Magistrate, Faridabad.

Needless to mention that, nothing observed here-in-above, would reflect, on merits in the trial of the main case, in any manner. September 01, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.09.03 12:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh