Tarsem Singh v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-25314 of 2016 .....

Date of decision:27.7.2016 Tarsem Singh

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Vinod Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.94 dated 3.6.2016 (AnnexureP.1) registered for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 307 and 506 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act at Police Station Rajound, Kaithal, District Kaithal.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

The petitioner is named in the FIR. He is stated to be armed with 315 bore gun. As per FIR, he fired shot with an intention to kill towards the complainant, but he saved himself. As per allegations, he again fired from his gun and the same passed touching the right ear of the mother of the complainant.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.08 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-25314 of 2016 [2] case, nature and gravity of the offences, the petitioner was armed with a deadly weapon, active role is attributed to him and he is required for custodial interrogation, I do not find it a fit case where the present petitioner is entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

July 27, 2016.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2016.08.08 11:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh