High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25344/2016allowed

Roshan Lal v. State Of Haryana

2016-09-15Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-25344 of 2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 15, 2016 Roshan Lal

...Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Jitender Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Vikramjit Singh, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.109 dated 22.02.2016 under Sections 148, 149, 188, 283 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act registered at Police Station City Hansi and report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. submitted under Sections 148, 149, 188, 283, 341 IPC and Section 8(b) of the National Highway Act. Notice of motion was issued and learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that as per the prosecution version, Vineet Gulati 2016.09.16 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh during the Jat Aandolan, some unknown persons campaigning for

CRM No.M-25344 of 2016 -2reservation have created barricade on Delhi Road, Hansi near Court complex by putting wooden planks on the road and they were armed with deadly weapons and caused damage to the public property. The present petitioner is not named in the FIR. He is in custody since 31.05.2016. He is not required for investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The trial of the case will take long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the disposal of the case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal/surety bonds in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate. September 15, 2016 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2016.09.16 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh