Shant Kumar Lamba v. State Of Haryana & Others

CRM-M No. 2447 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 2447 of 2017 DATE OF DECISION :- August 02, 2018 Shant Kumar Lamba

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and another

...Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. J.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Ms. Mehak Sawhney, Advocate for Dr. Deipa Singh, Advocate for complainant/respondent no. 2.

*** Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised between the parties. There was a matrimonial dispute between Gaurav Lamba and Shivali which has since resolved amicably. Both the spouses have started living together and they have been blessed with a second child, therefore, the petition for pre arrest bail filed by the petitioner be accepted.

Learned counsel for the complainant while conceding the factum of amicable settlement between the parties states that she has no objection if the petition is allowed.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Vijender Kumar submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and the matter PARVINDER SINGH 2018.08.03 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M No. 2447 of 2017 has been compromised between the parties and the challan has been filed in the Court, therefore, the petitioner is not required by the local police for further investigation.

Under such circumstances, the petition is accepted and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in newly added Sections 376/511 IPC, he would be released on bail subject to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/Arresting officer subject to his fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE August 02, 2018 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2018.08.03 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh