Rahul Gupta And ORS v. State Of Punjab And ANR




    
     

 Date of decision: 25th May, 2015  Rahul Gupta and others

Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and another

Respondents     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. P.K. Longia, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondent No.1.

None for respondent No.2.

 "
#$ !% Report dated 19.05.2015 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ludhiana has been received whereby after recording statements of complainant Poonam Gupta @ Sushma and the accused Rahul Gupta, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise arrived at between the parties is an outcome of voluntariness, free will of the parties, without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   Heard.

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court, being a pure matrimonial dispute, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out differences and resolving the personal dispute, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No.45 dated 28.05.2014 registered at Police Station Women Cell, District Ludhiana under Sections 406, 4989A IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed.

The petition stands allowed in those terms.

$  "
%   &'#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.05.26 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court