(O&M) Mohan Lal v. Seeta Ram

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Regular Second Appeal No. 190 of 2002 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.11.2024 Mohan Lal ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Seeta Ram ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

None for the appellant(s).

Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the respondent.

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

On 16.12.2023, the following order was passed:- "As per the report of the Registry, Mr. D.K.Kaushal, Advocate, has been duly served but there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

Let notice to the appellant as well as his counsel be again issued for 19.01.2024.

Counsel for the respondent be notified of the date fixed." 2.

As per the office report, the appellant has refused to receive notice whereas Mr. D.K.Kaushal, learned counsel representing the appellant, despite intimation, has not come forward to attend the hearing. 3.

The learned counsel representing the respondent submits that the parties have settled their dispute out of the Court and the cause for DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.11.27 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Regular Second Appeal No. 190 of 2002 (O&M) continuation of the appeal does not survive.

4.

Keeping in view the above facts, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge November 26, 2024 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2024.11.27 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document