Seema Parveen & ANR v. Ut Of Chandigarh & ORS
Date of decision: 3rd March, 2016 Seema Parveen and another Petitioners
Versus
UT Chandigarh and others Respondents ! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Ashima Mor, APP UT Chandigarh for respondents No.1 to 3.
None for respondents No.4 and 5.
!"# $ Learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his client has made a statement before this Court withdrawing the present petition.
Allowed to do so.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
# !$ %&'()"
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.03.03 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court