Mohan Singh And ANR v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No. 25673 of 2018 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 25673 of 2018 (O&M) Date of decision : 4.9.2018 ...

Mohan Singh @ Mohni (wrongly mentioned as Mohan Lal in the FIR) and another ................Petitioners vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Jasraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rakeshinder Singh Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.

Mr.Varinder Chhibbar, Advocate for the complainant. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Mr. Varinder Chhibbar, Advocate has appeared on behalf of the complainant by filing vakalatnama.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have since joined the investigation and have been released on interim bail.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Surinder Singh, Police Station Garhshankar, admits this fact, further BANITA CHUGH 2018.09.04 17:18 I am the author of this document

CRM-M No. 25673 of 2018 -2conceding that as a result of completion of investigation, challan has been filed against Jaspal Singh - husband of the deceased, whereas his parents Mohan Singh @ Mohni, referred to as Mohan Lal in the FIR and Smt. Charan Kaur @ Charno -present petitioners, have been found to be innocent and their names have been mentioned in column No.2 of the final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. In that way, the petitioners are not required by the local police. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition has become infructuous and it be disposed of accordingly. Dismissed being infructuous.

( H.S. Madaan ) 4.9.2018 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No BANITA CHUGH 2018.09.04 17:18 I am the author of this document