Vijay v. State Of Haryana




    
    

 Date of decision: 1st October, 2015  Vijay  Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana  Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. P.S. Punia, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Birbal, PS Sadar Jind.

Mr. Gaurav Sindwani, Advocate for the complainant.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Vijay in case FIR No.328 dated 06.09.2014 registered at Police Station Sadar Jind under Sections 302/323 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in consequence of the orders of interim bail dated 29.07.2015 passed by this Court, the petitioner has appeared before the trial Court and has RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.01 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



   been released on interim bail, which is not controverted by learned State counsel.

Since the petitioner in the light of allegations was earlier held innocent during investigations and subsequently with the exercise of powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C. has been summoned and thus, is not required for investigational purposes and in view of which the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 29.07.2015 is made absolute subject to compliance under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. $  "
%   &'()* #


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.10.01 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court