Kaushalya v. State Of Haryana
-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201/2 CRM-M-16895 of 2021 Date of Decision:13.01.2022 Kaushalya ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ......... Respondent CRM-M-12470 of 2021 Kaushalya and another ...... Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ......... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present:
Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate, for the petitioners.
***** AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. (ORAL) ase heard via CRM-M-12470 of 2021
!" #$$%& &'$&&$&(
) * #
*
+ * %(, %&$ %-' %-, !) .
* /%
-2-
.
.
. +
+
+
# +
. .
+
. + . +
.
+.
.
+ +
0 +
*
+
CRM-M-16895 of 2021 Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks the concession of 'anticipatory bail' under the provisions of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., in the context of the same FIR 0 $%$(&$&& +
*
+
+ 2 * +
+
3
+
&/$%&$&( . +
.
+ +
4&/$%&$&( .
+
+
52 6
-3-
+
!"%& &'$&&$&( +
) * #
*
+ *
%(,7%&$7%-'7%-,7/%!)
.
.
+
!" !
8 9 6 : .+
+# +
3
*
+
; )2,.
"22(&%'$&$&( +.
!" . .
+
)
)
) 8
9
.
.
) +
.
.
.
+
8
9
4+ + 82
9
.
<
.
+
-4- # # 3) .
1
+
.
.
+
.
+
+
.
!. +
+ .
.
+
.
+
+ . +
3 .
= 3
+
+
+
+
+
7!
*
.
* %/,8&9) ! 3
.
+ !
.. 3
>
.
+ + .
3 &(=&$&(:
*
-53 .
+
+
.
. .
.
. . + + +
8 9 !.
+
.
. &/$%&$&(
+
January 13, 2022 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) dinesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No