Sham Lal v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-968-2019 Date of Decision: 01.08.2024 SHAM LAL ...Appellant(s) Vs.

STATE OF HARYANA

...Respondent(s)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present :

None for the appellant.

Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, DAG, Haryana.

N.S.SHEKHAWAT, J. (Oral) 1.

On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the Registry was directed to inform the learned counsel for the appellant.

2.

Registry has reported that the appellant has been informed about the next date of hearing telephonically as well as by sending a message on his registered e mail id. Still there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

3.

The present appeal is ordered to be dismissed for want of prosecution.

16.10.2024 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) M.Sikka JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No MAMTA 2024.10.16 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment