Sonu v. State Of Haryana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.15533 of 2022 Date of Decision: 26.04.2022 Sonu ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present:
Mr. Lalit Kumar Narang, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana ANOOP CHITKARA J.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Mukesh Kumar, submits that present petition has become rendered infructuous as the accused was arrested because there was no interim relief in his favour. Given above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 26.04.2022 rittu Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No Whether reportable:
Yes/No RITTU 2022.04.27 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document