← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/2494/2017disposed of

Dolli Neha & ANR v. State Of Punjab & ORS.

2017-01-25Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-2494-2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No.M-2494 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : January 25, 2017 Dolli Neha and another ... Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Petitioners in person.

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) This petition is for seeking protection of life and liberty of petitioners, who alleged to have married against the wishes of respondents No. 4 and 5, parents of petitioner No.1.

Additional affidavit of petitioner No.2 filed today in the Court, is taken on record.

Petitioners have limited their prayer for taking appropriate action in accordance with law on the representation dated 16.01.2017 (Annexure P-5) made by the petitioners. It has been stated that both the petitioners are major. The date of birth of petitioner No.1-Dolli Neha is 04.02.1991 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-1) and that of petitioner No.2-Munish Kumar is 02.05.1986 as per copy of Aadhaar Card (Annexure P-2). They got married on 16.01.2017. Photographs of marriage are Annexure P-4.

In view of the prayer made by the petitioners, but without expressing any opinion on the validity of marriage of petitioners, petition is Sachin Mehta 2017.01.25 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-2494-2017 -2disposed of with direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Hoshiarpur to look into the representation dated 16.01.2017 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action in accordance with law, on receipt of copy of this order along with representation in his office. However, it is made clear that this order will have no effect on the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners or on any other civil or criminal proceedings instituted against them. (SURINDER GUPTA) January 25, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.01.25 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH