Rohit @ Rohit Bhatia v. State Of Haryana
!"!
#$ % %
& & & & %%%%
!
!
# ' ("% ) ) ) ) %%% "* #+ # $ $ $ $ ,- ,- ,- ,-)%)
)%)
)%)
)%) '
"
# $ '%'+
*)!#./0+1
' '%2!3"4* 0+1
' / *
!
!
# '% "%25!6)
+0++3%%0'7#% '%"/#) 6/ #0+1
''%)/!1842'0+1
' / 2*3!## % 99999 0%:'3;
0%:'3;
0%:'3;
0%:'3; 1.
Petitioner has filed instant petition under Section 482 of /' !7 .'!6)4'6"/)#/!
0
for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.52 dated 10.02.2025 under Sections 376 (2) (n) of IPC registered at Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Faridabad. 2.
Facts of the case are, prosecutrix gave her statement that she is 29 years of age and has done B.Ed. She is having 3 years old son. Her husband was working in Kajaria Company. She accompanied her husband to attend the marriage of elder brother of Rohit Bhatia in the year 2019. They started chatting with each other on facebook. He attended the birthday party
of her son. They became good friends. They used to go out together. Rohit insisted to visit her house but she refused. At his instance, she permitted him to visit her house once and thereafter they will end this relationship. Rohit came on 03.05.2023 at about 12.30 pm. He took a selfie with her. He tried to get physical against her wishes. Finally, he left the house. She requested him to delete everything from his phone but he refused. He again visited her house in May, 2023 and forcibly got physical with her and blackmailed her. In this way, he developed physical relations with her several times. She remained silent for some time. In December, 2024 due to mental stress she went to her parental house. He called her husband there and disclosed about everything. Thereafter, matter was reported to the police. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner denied the allegations. He confirmed that they used to talk to each other on facebook and also attended the birthday party of her son. In October, 2022, he told the complainant that it was not appropriate since they were family friends. It was complainant who called him to meet her. Petitioner has annexed the photographs as Annexure P-2. It is denied that he blackmailed her or trapped her in this relationship. In-fact, their relationship was consensual. There is delay in lodging the FIR. He has already joined the investigation and he is still ready to abide by the terms of bail order. Therefore, his anticipatory bail application may be allowed.
4.
Mr. Jashan Sekhon, Advocate appeared for Mr.Shiv Kumar, Advocate and filed power of attorney on behalf of complainant, which is taken on record. Status report is filed. Facts narrated in the FIR are
confirmed. It is submitted that petitioner has joined investigation on 31.03.2025. His mobile phone has been recovered and taken into police possession. As per status report, custodial interrogation was required for thorough investigation. However, today ASI Rajni is present in the Court who stated that petitioner is not required for any other purpose. 5.
Considering the aforesaid factual position, no purpose would be served by sending petitioner behind the bars. He has already joined the investigation and fully cooperated with the Investigating Agency. Therefore, without going into the merits of the case, anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner is allowed. He be not arrested. In case of his arrest, he be released on bail to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer concerned, subject to condition that petitioner will join investigation as and when required. He will not tamper with or interfere with investigation and will not leave country without prior permission as provided under Section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. % #+!#.2!"
33#
4"**3! !
#:";0!#70"
#++!"* "
+ '+!#.37"< 33%
% %
: ;
: ;
: ;
: ; "#+ =/
/ '"* 6!#.>'
"
# +$ ">
% =/
/ ''
* '
53 $ ">