High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/24956/2015dismissed

Dilbag Singh v. State Of Punjab And ANR

2015-09-17Mr Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain2 pages

KAPIL 2015.09.18 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24956-2015 [1] ***

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-24956-2015 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.09.2015 Dilbag Singh .......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and another .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. A.S. Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.

SABINA, J Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of criminal complaint No.1 dated 03.01.2013 alongwith summoning order dated 18.04.2013 and order dated 02.02.2015.

While issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court on 30.07.2015:- " Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied if the petitioner, who was residing in Singpore and has since returned to India, is allowed to join the proceedings. Copies of the orders filed by the petitioner indicate that without service of summons/ bailable warrants on the petitioner and

KAPIL 2015.09.18 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-24956-2015 [2] *** also after having received report on the summons that he was residing in Singapore, proceedings under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were ordered to be taken up against him.

Notice of motion for 17.9.2015.

Meantime, petitioner is directed to appear before the learned trial Court within a week from today. On his appearance he will be released on interim bail on his furnishing bail/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. "

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in pursuance to the above order, petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and has furnished necessary bail bonds. Accordingly interim bail furnished by the petitioner, is made absolute.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to seek quashing of complaint in question on the basis of compromise as the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. September 17, 2015 (SABINA) kapil JUDGE