Rohan Chauhan v. State Of Punjab
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
! "!
# $%
&
' ( )*+,- #
./#01- ')1#('
+'0' Mr.
')1#('
+'0'2 .
!
" " # $ %
& '
#
# ( )
* ' ( )+, - "
.
/ ' 0
1
'023&))% ( ( ' #4 ( 2 # #
!
" 1
"
"
) !
" " '
" ' "
"
!
' 023 !
'
023 5
6
"
/
"
' "#% 5 7 ' 5'
' "
" 4 & $ / 3
8 7 "
"
# #
" "
'
'
'
"
'
2 '
"
" 9 2
"
'
' '
: ; '' " "
"
''# % '
'
2
' ( )
'
"
"*
*
' ' % '' '
'
"
'
"'#% + - "
""
'
<
" ,
'
" , !
"
+ - +-#% + -+- 7 7
"
"
"
3 '
"
Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. The State of W.B. : 1973 CriLJ 1368. More so, the address of the petitioner is wrongly mentioned in the FIR and the summons/warrants against the petitioner were issued by the learned trial Court at that address only. Hence, it can reasonably be stated that the process never reached the petitioner. = '
"
"
' ( )+, - " .
/ ' 0
1
'023& ))% ( ( '#4 (2 # #
!
" 1
"
"
*
*
' ' ( 5 " "7 '
"
" #4%
3
&## *7'
2 " ' "
*7'
" "
"
7
"7 ' '
"
" "
& "
" ' '
"
""
,
'
" , "
!
"
) 2
"
" "
(MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No