← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/13278/2020allowed

Manvendra Alias Manvendra Choudhary And ANR v. State Of Haryana

2023-08-18Mrs. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 

CRM-M-13278-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: August 18th, 2023 Manvendra alias Manvendra Choudhary and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

Present:

Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rahul Mohan, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in FIR No.69 dated 16.02.2020 registered under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 and 506 of the IPC at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad. Mr. Gaurav Grover, Advocate, has filed power of attorney on behalf of the complainant, which is taken on record. Vide order dated 29.05.2020, the petitioners had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under:- "Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that co-accused has filed CRM-M-11114-2020. In the said petition, notice of motion has been issued for 22.07.2020 and the petitioner is asked to join investigation"

PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.18 05:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh

CRM-M-13278-2020 (O&M) -2Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in compliance of order dated 29.05.2020, the petitioners have joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. It has also been submitted by the learned counsel that during the pendency of the instant petition, the parties have effected an amicable settlement, which fact, in turn, has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant.

  

   

         

          

           

  

        

      



  

     In view of the above, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 29.05.2020, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Needless to say, in case the petitioners misuse the concession of bail granted to them, the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation of the same.

August 18th, 2023 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2023.08.18 05:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document.

Chandigarh