Nahani Devi v. State Of Haryana And Others
!
"!#
$%& "'
(&)*+*",- !!
-
.
!
/
.
!
/
/ 0 !
$1 !
"# $ %% &'
!(()
* ++ ,-.
,/
$0,"" - / "
#
## &1 &2 !((2
* $$
$ *
$ * #$
. 3
* , 45 * #+
%
" 5 * # , 5 * #+ +#
0,"" -
/*+ + **$
"* +#
!
"# #$
*+
+6
, " #*
# %&
'# ( #
"
7 * 8* 6
, )*
+,- # 9$ 8#*#
$*
$ #* &!
%&!) %!
&!
%&&1 #+ * *
7* $ %&%1 # # 0# * * )& $$
# +# #
7 * 8#$ # 0#+
##
)
:
+
9!((2
;$* $$+ ,
$0,"" +
$
*, 5 +
+ $
"
3#
$0,"
#5 , 4 +* #5 +
+ < $ ++
# #+ 5
$
=
9
!% %&&> , 5 , +
$0,"" * , ? * 5 +5
$0," + @# 3 # #* *
#+ #!% * #* + +
*$# ## 3,
>
9 ! " # $ * #$ $
*A "10. We find absolutely no force in the argument advanced by the respondents that B.Ed qualification is a higher qualification then TTC and therefore, the B.Ed candidates should be held to be eligible to compete for the post. On behalf of the applicants, it is pointed out before us that Trained Teacher's Certificate is given to teachers specially trained to teach small children in primary classes whereas for B.Ed degree, the training imparted is to teach students of classes above primary. B.Ed degree holders, therefore, cannot necessarily be held to be holding qualification suitable for appointment as teachers in primary schools. Whether for a particular post, the source of recruitment should be from the candidates with TTC qualification or B.Ed qualification, is a matter of recruitment policy. We find sufficient logic and
justification in the State prescribing qualification for the post of primary teachers as only TTC and not B.Ed. Whether B.Ed qualification can also be prescribed for primary teachers is a question to be considered by the authorities concerned but we cannot consider B.Ed candidates, for the present vacancies advertised, as eligible." '
9 # * *+ + )& # *
+ $ #+
3
$+ # * $ #8#$ #
(
$
#$
-/
/
/
)%"2&
B 3#<
< B +
<