Suresh v. The State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-13546 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13546 of 2019 Date of Decision: 10.04.2019 Suresh ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present:- Mr. Madan Sandhu, Advocate, for Mr. Ajay Shekhawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Through instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. prayer has been made for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case arising from FIR No.22 dated 12.01.2018 registered under Sections 302, 397, 148, 149 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station City Jind, District Jind.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends petitioner is not named in the FIR. He has been implicated falsely on the disclosure statement of co-accused, which is a very weak type of evidence. All the material witnesses have turned hostile. Petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2018. Conclusion of trial may take a sufficient long time. No useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner any more in jail. On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed the bail application.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.11 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

-2CRM-M-13546 of 2019 expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

(RAMENDRA JAIN) April 10, 2019 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RAVINDER SINGH 2019.04.11 09:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document