Krishan And ANR. v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-2541 of 2017 .....

Date of decision:27.1.2017 Krishan and another

...Petitioners

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. S.K. Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.181 dated 11.8.2016 registered for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Uklana, District Hisar.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

From the record, I find that as per the allegations in the FIR the accused, who were working as Mate under MANREGA scheme, shows the attendance of deceased persons and Government employee and in the same way prepared forged ID attendance. It is also in the FIR that loss has been caused to the tune of Lakhs of rupees to the Government. The petitioner is named in the FIR. He is required for custodial interrogation. Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.01.31 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-2541 of 2017 [2] Keeping in view the allegations in the FIR, I do not find it a fit case where the present petitioner is entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail.

Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

January 27, 2017.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No Harpal Singh Parmar 2017.01.31 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh