Sattu Ram v. Lekh Raj And Others

RSA No.100 of 1996 {1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.100 of 1996 Date of decision:15.02.2018 Sattu Ram ... Appellant Vs.

Lekh Raj (deceased) through LRs ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:- Ms. Kamalpreet, Advocate for the appellant.

AMIT RAWAL J. (Oral) The present appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of facts and law, whereby, the suit for mandatory injunction has been decreed and the appeal filed before the Lower Appellate Court, has also been dismissed.

As per office report, notices could not be issued to LRs of sole respondent No.(i) (ii) and (iv) for want of complete address and the application for bringing on record legal representatives of sole respondent no.(iii) and (v), has not been filed.

Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that despite repeated requests, no information has been received from her client. Since counsel for the appellant is unable to comply with the order dated 09.10.2017, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Savita 2018.02.20 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

RSA No.100 of 1996 {2} Liberty is granted to the appellant for revival of the appeal in case something survives.

(AMIT RAWAL) JUDGE February 15, 2018 savita Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Savita 2018.02.20 10:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh