High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25472/2017allowed

Pardeep Kumar @ Golu v. State Of Punjab

2017-10-25Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-25472-2017 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No.M-25472 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: October 25, 2017 Pardeep Kumar @ Golu ......PETITIONER(s).

VERSUS

State of Punjab ....RESPONDENT(s).

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. A.S. Sivia, Advocate for the petitioner (s).

Mr. C.L. Pawar, Sr. D.A.G. Punjab.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.3 dated 05.01.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402, 148 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station City Malout, District Sri Muktsar Sahib. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that petitioner has joined the investigation, which is still in progress but his custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of further investigation. In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 31.07.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, Sachin Mehta 2017.10.25 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

CRM-M-25472-2017 -2subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court, which the trial Court will decide on the basis of evidence collected during investigation.

( SURINDER GUPTA ) October 25, 2017 JUDGE Sachin M.

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No Sachin Mehta 2017.10.25 17:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh