Marketing Committee Hodel v. M/S/Rawat Sh.Hoder And ORS.

2024:PHHC:035364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-1036-1996 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.03.2024 Marketing Committee, Hodel ... Appellant(s)

Versus

M/s Rawat Shop, Hodel & Another ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1.

On 21.11.2023 the learned counsel earlier representing the appellant had stated that file had been taken away by the appellant and hence notice was issued to the appellant. As per the office report, the appellant remains unserved as the person, namely, Mr. Rajbir Singh, AR, who was present at the time of service, reported that EO-cum-Secretary through whom the present appeal had been filed, was no longer in the office. It is strange that the Marketing Committee had refused to accept the notice only on the ground that EO-cum-Secretary through whom the present appeal had been filed was no longer in the office. In view thereof, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 2.

Dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

12.03.2024 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO Yogesh Sharma 2024.03.13 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

High Court Chandigarh