Sehzad v. State Of Haryana And Others

    

       !"# .  $ %$ &

!''"() *+('"

!

 ,  

( -  (./0"- 12!' "1!1 '!  /"

Present:

Mr. Sham Lal Saha, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

3' (2 % "(()"

"  **** 1!1 '!  /" 513( 04 1.

Instant criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred for issuance of a writ in the nature Habeas Corpus to release the detenues (as mentioned in para No.4 of the present petition), who is stated to be illegally detained by respondents Nos.4 to 6 in the brick kiln owned by them.

2.

A Division Bench of this Court in LPA No. 32 of 2013, titled as
  

      , has held as under:2 "
 

    

   

   

      

        



         

     

  

 

  

       



           

!" !#

 $

 % &'  

('!)#"*

+     

 +



    

 +    +       +          '     ,    -         

 

 

 

 .         +



    + 

 $

 % &'  

( '!)#"  +          JITESH LAL 2026.03.06 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document



    +     

        

 +    

      

/

     )!01!      2   3    

4  



     



  ,  -   

   

    !)#"' 





        

            +                     

5 3.

Accordingly, this Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.22District Magistrate, Sonepat, Haryana, to treat this petition as a complaint under the Bonded Labour (Abolition) Act, 1976 and take immediate action in accordance with law, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along2with a copy of the writ petition.  31!1 '!  /" 4 12 "

  1 '"!

66$ ,7 89$   * 9

66$$,$:;  * 9 JITESH LAL 2026.03.06 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document