Narinder Kaur v. Kamal Kishor Yadav And Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
025 (O&M) COCP No.1261 of 20 IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA ARH AT CHANDIGA 203-U NARINDER KA Vs KAMAL KISHO CORAM: HON
Present:
Mr for COCP No Date of D o.1261 of 2025 (O&M) Decision: 12.05.2025 ......Petitioner AUR ....Respondents OR YADAV AND OTHERS N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKES SH MANUJA . Puneet Kumar Bansal, Advocat te the petitioner.
Mr HARKESH MA . Siddharth Sandhu, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.
**** ANUJA, J. (Oral) 1.
Lea arned State counsel on instruct tions from Sh. Kamal Arora, D Dy.
DEO (EE), Fero ozepur, submits that financial ben nefits payable to the petitioner sh hall be released with hin two weeks from today.
2.
In view of the aforesaid undertak king by the respondent(s), learn ned counsel for the p petitioner does not press the pres sent petition.
3.
Dis smissed as not pressed. Rule stan nds discharged.
4.
How wever, in case the respondent ts fail to abide by the afores said xtent of 1/3rd shall remain attach undertaking, sal lary of respondent No.2 to the e hed till the complian nce is made.
5.
A c copy of this order, if needed be also forwarded to the IAS Bran nch, Punjab Civil Se cretariat, Chandigarh for compli iance with respect to attachment t of salary of the offi ficer concerned in case of non-co ompliance of undertaking.
May 12, 2025 Atik (HA ARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whe Whe ether speaking/reasoned Yes/No ether reportable Yes/No MOHMED ATIK 2025.05.13 14:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment