Manohar v. Raj Pal

IN THE HIGH C OURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA-1313-1996 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.10.2024 Manohar and Others ....Appellants

VERSUS

Raj Pal and Others ....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

None for the appellants.

Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 10. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Present appeal pertains to the year 1996. Vide order dated 23.11.2023 notices were issued to the appellants. As per office report, appellant Nos.1 to 3, 6 to 8, 10, 13, 14 to 18, 20 and 21 are stated to have died. Appellant Nos.4, 5 and 12 were not found residing at the given address. Respondent Nos.9, 11 and 19 stand served. None has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants. No other address of appellant Nos. 4, 5 and 12 is available except for the one as mentioned in the memo of parties as well as in the judgments of the Courts. None has come forward to be impleaded as legal representatives of appellant Nos. 1 to 3, 6 to 8, 10, 13, 14 to 18, 20 and 21.

2.

In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. JITENDER KUMAR 2024.10.29 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

RSA-1313-1996 -23.

Dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to revive in case anything survives in the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.

( ALKA SARIN ) 28.10.2024 JUDGE jk NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2024.10.29 10:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh