← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/26589/2018allowed

Brijesh Kumar Parashar v. State Of Haryana

2018-08-14Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Sangwan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH (i) CRM No.M-26589 of 2018 (O&M) Brijesh Kumar Parashar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(ii) CRM No.M-26611 of 2018 (O&M) Brijesh Kumar Parashar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

(iii) CRM No.M-26621 of 2018 (O&M) Brijesh Kumar Parashar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

Date of Decision: August 14, 2018

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.L.S.Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

All the above-mentioned cases are taken up together. VINEET GULATI 2018.08.18 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Petitioner has filed these petitions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

CRM No.M-26589 of 2018 and connected petitions -2for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIRs No.251, 252 and 253 all dated 19.03.2018 under Section 174-A IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Khawaja, District Faridabad.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petitions.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. At the time of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that bail has been granted to the petitioner in all the three complaint cases, in which the petitioner has been declared proclaimed offender, as he has already surrendered before the trial Court. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find that petitioner is not required for custodial interrogation. No useful purpose will be served by sending the petitioner to custody.

Therefore, finding merit in all the petitions, the same are allowed. It is ordered that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer in all cases. However, he shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. August 14, 2018 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No VINEET GULATI 2018.08.18 11:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh