Surinder Kumar And ANR v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-2561-2015 Date of Decision: 16.01.2024 Surinder Kumar and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Present:

Mr. Parvez Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ravinder Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.

**** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No.
Dated
Police Station
Sections
38
06.07.2006
Vigilance Bureau, Ferozepur
409, 120-B, 420 IPC and 13

(1) (d) r/w 13 (2) of PC Act, 1988
Seeking quashing of FIR captioned above, the petitioners have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC.
2.

State counsel on instructions from ASI Baldev Raj submits that the trial has been concluded and the matter has been rendered infructuous as the petitioners have been acquitted on 27.04.2023. 3.

Given above, the present petition stands disposed of as rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA)
JUDGE
16.01.2024
Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes
Whether reportable:

No.
Jyoti Sharma 2024.01.18 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Sector 1, High Court, Chandigarh