Simranjeet Kaur And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2401-2025 Date of Decision: 11.03.2025 SIMRANJEET KAUR AND ANR ....Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

Present:

Mr. Prashant Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Singh, DAG, Punjab.

**** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. The details, relevant for decision of the present petition, are tabulated as under:- Petitioner No. 1 Petitioner No. 2 Name(s) Simranjeet Kaur Sukhchain Singh Age (in years) About 18 years and 07 months About 23 years and 06 months Date of marriage 06.03.2025 Rite Sikh Represented on 06.03.2025 Submitted to Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala Family members arrayed as Respondent Nos.4 to 6 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their family members, SANGEETA 2025.03.11 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRWP-2401-2025 who are threatening and interfering in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. It is the first marriage of both the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P-5), to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, wherein, they have expressed their apprehension.

3.

Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4.

On asking of the Court, learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent - State. Let requisite copies of the complete paper book be supplied to learned State counsel during course of the day. 5.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. - 2, to look into the representation dated 06.03.2025 (Annexure P-5), qua threat perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.

6.

However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) March 11, 2025 JUDGE Sangeeta Whether reasoned/speaking:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No SANGEETA 2025.03.11 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document