High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25722/2017allowed

Dimpi v. State Of Haryana

2017-09-11Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj2 pages

CRM-M-25722 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CRM-M-25722 of 2017 Date of Decision: 11.09.2017 Dimpi ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vikas Bishnoi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Grewal, DAG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.205 dated 18.02.2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379-A of Indian Penal Code (for short, "IPC") at Police Station Hisar Civil Lines, District Hisar.

Heard.

The incident took place on 18.02.2017, when some boys, who came in a car, snatched purse of wife of complainant-Dr. Dinesh Aggarwal and succeeded in running away from the spot.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner was arrested in another case bearing FIR No. 218 dated 24.02.2017, registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Hisar, wherein he suffered disclosure statement about this incident and recovery of `200/- and a wrist watch was effected from him.

The petitioner was arrested on 25.02.2017 and is in custody Jitender Kumar 2017.09.12 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-25722 of 2017 -2since then.

It is submitted that after completion of investigation, police has presented challan against the petitioner in Court and trial is in progress. In view of above but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, the present petition is allowed. Petitioner-Dimpi is ordered to be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, subject to following terms:- (a) The petitioner shall comply with the conditions mentioned in Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(b) In the event of his absence on any date of hearing, the benefit of bail allowed to the petitioner shall stand withdrawn. The trial Court shall be competent to cancel his bail bond and surety bond and proceed to procure his presence in accordance with law. In that eventuality the petitioner shall have to apply for bail afresh. (c) He shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court.

September 11, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.09.12 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH