Mukesh v. State Of Haryana




    
     

 Date of decision: 10th September, 2015  Mukesh

Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

Respondent     !  "
  "
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. R.A. Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate for the complainant.

 "
#$ !% Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Mukesh in case FIR No.145 dated 03.08.2013 registered at Police Station Siwani under Sections 148/149/302/323/325/506/427/120B IPC. It is inter alia argued that the petitioner was found innocent during investigations and that subsequently in exercise of powers under Section 319 Cr.P.C. he has been summoned as an accused and seeks parity with his co;accused namely Anoop and Virender who have been similarly placed and allowed anticipatory bail by this Court RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.11 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court



 

vide orders dated 02.07.2015 and 27.07.2015 respectively and confirmed vide orders dated 10.09.2015.

In view of the principle of parity, it will suffice the purpose and ends of justice if the petitioner is directed to put in appearance before the trial Court within ten days from today and on his doing so he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court. With these observations, the petition stands disposed off.
$  "
%   "&'(&)*&+

#


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.11 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court