Jarnail Singh v. Manoj Navetia
!
" # $%&
'
(( )*+,
!
" # $%&
' ! "
# #
$%&%'( -.
/0&
' ),1 1 /0&
' ),1 #
) "
!
2 33
1 1& 3 ' .
# 3
456& / 7 & ./
7 3 2 '
' 1'
# 3
!
# / 8() 9 !:,7 ;# 3'# $# 3
( )04# ! ,'
1.
0
# /<
/ 33 33'
1
% *!0(8(= (# ( % >
#3 0 /
) 9%>0 :,
!
*
(
#
./
(/
'
/ / =
?' #3 3
' 4# '
)04# ! ,
0 '
()04# !,6
'
&;# '
/ 6 6 3 . 5
$ 07#
* (/ 3# / / =/ #& / 1 3
&
3 ' >
1 ./
' # ;# 1
(8 (
(
/ / = )04# !(, &# ' 56& /
3 ;#)#'
,6 # &33
( )04# !, 6 3
7 @># A#B 2 /
( ( )04# !, 6 &
' 56& '
# '#
3 # ' 3'
()04# !, # (/ %> 0 * / ' 3
3 )04# !,1
#
3'
3 1 1 6 '
6#
#6
3 / 6 /
3 .1 0
'
3 / ' 3&
)04# !,0
& '
/
#
/ & $# 3
)04# !8,/& ' 3
#3'
3 ' .
/ = &1. 3/ ' ''
1
6
0''
#
6 6 '&3'#
(
)04# ! ,/6 1. 3
6 3 1 7
#
# C
# '
#
& & ' &$# 3
)04# !8,2 ' 3
3 1
#
6#
# 6 '#
3' ' 3 1 6
> /
/
3 )04# !,1
56& / . '
#1#
3
# .3&
7 ' 3
)#'
,0# /
6 0''
#
&
1. 3 3
1 7
#
&$# 3
( )04# ! ,
# ' #13
3
3 )04# !, #
7 3 7 '
.3
. # (/%>0 >
3 )04# !,6 ' 3
.
& !/ # 1
#+#
!
## &
# '
' #
6
/
'
3'
3 1 6 '
' # 3
3
)04# !,
'
3# / / =/ #& /6
3 / 6 36# 1 1 >
6
,
3 1. # 1
# /'
7 #
3 / 3
1#
3/
.
'
56& /
4'
;#3 7
3
' /
#
1 6
.
3 1 1 0
1 <31 . 5 #
Gajanan Narayan Joshi vs. Haridas Bhikulal Jobanputra 2011 (1) R.C.R. (Cri.) 798/ ' 7
# # ! D/3
6 1 &
The same is obvious as construing the same as an admission of guilt, the same should have disclosed a clear cut admission of commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act or admission of all the facts constituting commission of such offences on his part !
" # $
%
$
it is prompted to record that agreement to pay cheque amount would never be construed as an admission of guilt of commission of offence under Section of the Negotiable Instruments Act.&)3'
, A#
1
#
5 #
Ashis Ghosh vs. Ajay Kumar Ghosh 2017(3) R.C.R.(Criminal)352/' 7
# # 2 7 $/
6
-
'# willingness of the Petitioners to pay back the money repeatedly expressed in the Trial Court as well as, in the Appellate Court may not be termed as 'judicial confession of guilt ' in strict sense of the term
(
) " # $ &)3'
, !#
8 < '
6 / #
3 '
'
#
1 6
'
( %>0 # # ./ &' 1 #
3
3
# #
/
3
/ '
2 1$ '# '1 %>0 # 4' #'
33 3 # ;# '
& 3 3 3' 3 7 ;# '
.3 & 3>' '
# 1 6
/ #
1 &
7
3
6 # 3
0 ./ 6# 1 # #
6 #
$# 4' #'
'
(/%>0 A. Jurisdiction > 33
6 '# ;# '
3 ), %>0 '#
6# 1 3 &1'
1 1
6 9 ## : 9'
.:3
# ) Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Inderpal Singh (2016) 1 SCC(Cri) 472, B. Drill of Section 202 Cr.P.C./ Section 225 BNSS > 3
# ;# .# != <%
#' 3'
# ( %>0 /
$# #.
&
/ '
#2 1&3 ;# . 1 # 1. #
1 #3 &
13
4 36
56& & 6
1
71.3 & ) In re:
Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 NI Act 1881) *
+ ,-. / /'/'.
C. Legal Notice
&
6 ' # '# ;#
3'
# (%>0 #
3#
.
'
#
/ # 1# 3 3 #/ ;#
3# #/#3
7 3) Suman Sethi vs. Ajay K.
Churiwal (2000) 2 SCC 380, D. Power of Attorney A 3'
' # (%>0
# '6
.'
3' 2 '6
.
3# & 6
.= ## '#76
'
76 '6
.
4'
.
2
. 3'
6 3 6 3'
/1#
3
'
1
'
) A.C. Narayanan vs. State of Maharashtra (2014) 11 SCC 790,
E. Vicarious Liability >
&
# 1 ./ 3'
.3# 1 3'
#A#
/# 1 .6# .1'
' 6 6 '1 # .1#
#3'
.2
3# 7 3 6
. #1 #33 3 ) SMS Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. Neeta Bhalla and another (2005) 8 SCC 89, F. Joint Account > '# ;## 3 $ # # 1'
# # ;# 1 1. & .' # ) Mrs. Aparna A. Shah vs. M/s Sheth Developers Private Limited and another (2013) 4 SCC(Cri) 241, G. Amendment of Complaint E 33 3 .
3'
'
$# 1 # '' '
.
1. 33 /# / .#
3 .# 1 # 1. 3
33 56& /
33 '
1
66 .# 3
.
'
#
'
$#
A '
#
'
'
.3
'
&/6 #
1
' &
) S.R. Sukumar vs. S. Sunaad Raghuram (2015) 9 SCC 609)
H. Nature of Trial %
./ # ( %>0 # 1
#33
./ '#
1. ( %>0 56& /
3 .&
3 #33
3 ' /1. 1 3 #
& 3
) In re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 NI Act 1881, ..
I. Issue of Process 2 3 6
.
#3# 1 1.
1 #33 3F 6& /
4' 2 #333 .1 1.
' 3 ) 1#''
1.
,2 #
1
7
'
1.#
&
#>#33
&1 7# &/33
6#'
3# 1
7) Sunil Bharti Mittal vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (2015) 4 SCC 609, Indian Bank Assn. vs. Union of India (2014) 5 SCC 590, U.P. Pollution Control Board vs Dr Bhupendra Kumar Modi and another (2009) 2 SCC 147) J. Clubbing of Trials >3#
'
;# &1# '
3
/
#
#1
'
' & # ;# #
2 # 3#
'
;#/# '
/ 1.3 1
333#
'
2 3
$ 3#
'
'#
# 8 != <%
/6# 1 # A#
.
ō'
# (
%>0 3 &
3'
3
3
) In re: Expeditious Trial of Cases under Section 138 NI Act 1881, . Charashni Kumar Talwani vs. M/s Malhotra Poultries, Naraingarh Road, Barwala 2014(1) R.C.R. (Criminal) 233.
K. Mediation 2
3# 7
'1
3'# /
./
.
2 1$ '# ' (
%>0 '
& 3'
.3 3 4' #
& .3. '' '# #0# / 6# 1
0''
#
3
3
1
''
3 ) R. Vijayan vs. Baby (2012) 1 SCC 260, L. Standard of Proof 2
'
'
%>0 6# 1 '
'
1 1 2 #3 .'
& 4'
6 '
'
&
) M.S. Narayana Menon alias Mani vs.
State of Kerala and another 2006(6) SCC 39, M. Compounding 2 33
# .
%>0 7
# ( %>0 &
6 3 7 3'# 3'
6# 1
& 3.# %>0
& 3'#
3'#
# 1#
/ 6& / 3'#
1
#1$ '
3'
0 #
3/ 1
#33 #
3'#
.
3
6
/#
.'
'
) Raj Reddy Kallem vs. State of Haryana (2024) 8 SCC 588, N. Review 2
#
'6
6 1.'
1#
6# 3# &6/6 &
! <%
2 3.
# &7 '6 5 #
# !=<%
) Adalat Prasad vs. Rooplal Jindal and others (2004) 7 SCC 338, "
Discharge A
1 & 1. !/
6#
&'6
# #33
#33
56& / ' 3'
3
<%
# 1
#33
) Proviso to Section 274 BNSS, P. Interim Compensation
! "" # $ "$%"&$ '"( !) ! ! # "*+Pawan Bhasin vs.
State of U.P. and another 2023 SCC Online SC 1314 G.J. Raja vs.
Tejraj Surana (2020) 3 SCC(Cri) 725, Q. Recalling of witnesses &
'
# (
!6# 1
3
# .
) Sethuraman vs.
Rajamanickam (2009) 5 SCC 153, R.Concurrent Sentence E
$ 7 3#
1'
1/
3
'
( %>0
/&
33#
'
/
' & 3 . 1 1 # #
. ) Benson v. State of Kerala 2016(4) RCR (Criminal) 602, S. Payment on filing of appeal > #
& / 0''
#
. '
.3 '
;# 3# # '. ''
#
%>0 56& ''
# .3# 1'
&
# '
3 143'
3 3 2 '
&
1
' & . 3 13 &6
1 1 8 ) Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and others (2024) 1 SCC(Cri) 90 G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana(supra), !#
0 #' 1&#/ '
' 3
# ' ' # .' & .
. 1.
6 0''
#
6
1. #
! 3
#
),/
./
'
2
. #
'. #
/
#
0 3. 3'
.
6# # '
. $#
0' '. 1'
#
," " - E ' 7 = G=% E '
G=%