Saraswati v. Ram Phal Andors

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH FAO-289-2001 with XOBJC-17-CII-2002 (O&M) Date of decision:20.04.2026 SARASWATI ...APPELLANTS

VERSUS

RAM PHAL AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL

Present:

None for appellant.

Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Manvir Verma, Advocate for respondent No.3.

*** PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Despite due service, neither appellant nor anyone on her behalf has put in appearance before this Court.

2.

It appears appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present appeal.

3.

As per office report, respondent No.1 has since died and respondent No.2 could not be served for want of complete address. 4.

In view of above, present appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. 5.

Cross-objections preferred by respondents No.1 and 2 are also dismissed in the absence of any material available on record to summon respondents No.1 and 2.

6.

Parties shall be at liberty revive the present appeal or crossobjections by showing just cause. 7.

Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. SUNIL CHANDER 2026.04.20 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

FAO-289-2001 with -2XOBJC-17-CII-2002 (O&M) 8.

Photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case. (PARMOD GOYAL) JUDGE 20.04.2026 Sunil Chander Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No SUNIL CHANDER 2026.04.20 18:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document