Ronak v. State Of Haryana

Crl. Misc. No. M-2683 of 2018 - 1In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Crl. Misc. No. M-2683 of 2018 Date of Decision: 03.5.2018 Ronak ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY

Present:

Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal, AAG, Haryana assisted by ASI Vijender.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J The petitioner is seeking regular bail in FIR No. 657 dated 12.10.2017 registered at Police Station City, District Sonepat under Sections 354, 365, 452, 506, 511 IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the statements made by the victim and her mother who is the complainant and states that both of them had not supported the prosecution version. Petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2017. The victim as well as the complainant have not supported the prosecution version. Without commenting anything on the merits of the case and considering the fact that the trial will take time to conclude, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing local surety and adequate bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.05.03 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

Crl. Misc. No. M-2683 of 2018 - 2Magistrate.

(ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE May 03, 2018 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

No Gurpreet Singh Bhatia 2018.05.03 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh