Parshotam Sharma And ANR v. State Of Punjab And Another
IN TH HE HIGH COURT FOR THE E STATES OF PUNJAB AND HANDIGARH HARYANA AT CH )*)+ ,- -.
12 2 )#*#) )*)+
### 22 /
### 3
'
!" # $%&'" ' & Mr. 0,$0 + 1 )/$
0($2 &( $#
3+ -+
- 4) ) $ 5
"6
70 8 59$+-' $()
$:&14
5 !
"#
"$ % " %"# &' ( )$*+$/- -+ + ,
3 + + - + - + -,+ + , */ / - ./ - ' $+ + ,/ /+++ + ' * * $,+
) < $ / + -,$ +-, ,-,+ +- + ,/ /-,+ ' $$+-, ++ % & + , +
= - + ++ - ', + '
+ ,+ , , $ & , + ,+ "6
,, / / + , # 0, + / +;
;,+- '$ "!
% %$ / +/ / ) $ ' + , ,"6
0+ / ' + + , , ++ + / , / $ + - $ 8 $ + $ / / + 9' 1
+ +Rohit Ku umar Vs. State of Delhi : 2008 Crl.
J. 2561. :$ + , + + ,/8 -"
+ ++ ' "6
$/ ,+ /,-+ 5"- ++ ' * $, / + 9' $+/ $ + ,5"- , + + , / ,- 1 + + Gurappa Gugal and others Vs.
Mysore : 1969 CriLJ 826 and State of M Shokat Ali Vs. State of Haryn na :
CR (Criminal) 339. 2020(2) R 0 -$ / ,
/ // $+ + / ,+ "6
708
59$ + - ' $ )
() $ :&1 4
5 !
"#
"$ % % " %"# &' ()$ * +$ /- + + ,$ / + , !
*/ $+ '
' / + / )$ 2 + -$-++ %
4 4 & - +- $ + , 2 - 2 - +- ' //
4 -++ ' $ ' +,8+ - 8+ - + + , '+ ,
3 ++ + '$ ,-
&, +++ '/+ /),-$+ ,, + (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE )#*#)*)+
Yes/No Whet ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whet ther reportable