← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/25909/2017dismissed

Sunny Gujjar v. State Of Punjab

2017-07-28Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-25909 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 28, 2017 Sunny Gujjar

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Mandeep S. Sachdev, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, Sr. DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.103 dated 31.05.2017 under Section 306 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Basti Bawa Khel, District Jalandhar.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel appeared and contested the petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. From the record, I find that FIR has been got registered by one Deepak Kumar aged about 21 years. As per the FIR, one Kamal gave him abuses on phone. Complainant-deceased Deepak Kumar narrated this Vineet Gulati 2017.08.01 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-25909 of 2017 -2version to the councillor of his area. Then Kamal, Sunny Gujjar and Rajat asked the complainant as to why he went to Pardeep Rai, Councillor and they also told that many cases are pending against them and they would teach him a lesson. Even Rajat gave him threatening on phone. Being fed up with the threatening, Deepak Kumar consumed poisonous tablets used for keeping wheat.

The present petitioner is named in the FIR. Active role is attributed to him.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, nature and gravity of the offence, I find that petitioner is required for custodial interrogation and he is not entitled to benefit of anticipatory bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

July 28, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.08.01 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh