Neelam v. State Of Haryana & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M-25982 of 2017 Date of Decision : August 10, 2017 Neelam ................................................................. Petitioner Verus State of Haryana and others ................................. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? ...

Present:

None.

...

LISA GILL, J. (Oral) There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing.

Today, despite the matter having been called twice none appears on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing this case.

Dismissed for non-prosecution.

( LISA GILL ) 10.08.2017 JUDGE rupi Note: Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable:

Yes / No Rupinder Kaur 2017.08.11 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document