← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/7012/2024disposed of

Kavita v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024-03-22Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya2 pages

CWP No.7012 of 2024 -1- 2024:PHHC:041798 and connected case 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 122+124 ***** CWP No.7012 of 2024 Date of Decision : 22.3.2024 Kavita ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CWP No.7022 of 2024  

Rojee Rani ..... Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Pardeep Sehrawat, Advocate (in CWP No.7012-2024) Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocate (in CWP No.7022-2024) for the petitioner(s) Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana --- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J. (ORAL): These petitions have been filed, inter alia, to set-aside the common office order dated 16.3.2024, whereby Primary Teachers (PRT) of 2017-Batch have been allocated schools in the permanent district allotted to them.

2.

The contention is that the process of allotment of schools, which has been done on the basis of points scored by the teachers as per transfer policy, has not been correctly carried out. For instance, it has been pointed out that petitioner-Kavita, who has scored 50.31 points, has Ashwani Kumar 2024.04.05 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.7012 of 2024 -2- 2024:PHHC:041798 and connected case  not been allotted the station of her third preference, which has gone to Sandeep Singh despite having 41.23 points and being in 'nowhere category'.

3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the discrepancies as pointed out by the petitioner(s) in these and some other cases, have been noticed and the Department is in the process of relooking the allocation of schools to different categories. A final decision in the matter will soon be taken by considering all the grievances. The petitioner(s) can also make a representation to the respondents raising their objections which will also be looked into before a final decision is taken.

4.

In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) have no objection to the petitions being disposed of in terms thereof by granting liberty to the petitioner(s) to make representation(s) to the Department in this regard within ten days. 5.

Ordered accordingly.

6.

Further, the respondents are directed not to relieve the petitioner(s) from their present place of posting till final decision on the allocation of schools is taken after considering the objections/grievances. 7.

Photocopy of this order be placed on the connected case file.  (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 22.3.2024 Ashwani   

          Ashwani Kumar 2024.04.05 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document