High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/27088/2016disposed of

Sudha Uppal v. State Of Punjab

2016-08-08Mrs. Justice Raj Rahul Garg1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27088-2016 Date of Decision:- 08.08.2016 Sudha Uppal ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

Present:

Mr. Sandeep S. Majithia, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present petition.

Dismissed as not pressed.

However, the personal presence of the petitioner is exempted before the trial Court, subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute her/their identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in her/their absence but in the presence of his/their counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose. August 08, 2016 ( RITU BAHRI ) naresh.k JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Naresh Kumar 2016.08.10 14:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh