Sushil @ Kala v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-26260 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 31, 2017 Sushil @ Kala

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.Amit Khatkar, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.413 dated 18.05.2016 under Sections 307, 302, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Hisar.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

As per the prosecution case, deceased Sant Lal was shot at by three persons including one Kuldeep. The trial is going on. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Some witnesses have been examined. If the petitioner is released on bail, then there is every chance of tampering with the evidence. Active role has been attributed to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that co-accused Vineet Gulati 2017.08.03 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh Rajbir has been released on bail by this Court. I have gone through the that

CRM No.M-26260 of 2017 -2order. In that order, it is held that nothing has been attributed against Rajbir and he has been impleaded only being father of Kuldeep, which are not the facts in the present case.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case, nature and gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

July 31, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.08.03 10:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh